Cothorn v. Warden

155 A.2d 652, 221 Md. 581
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided September 25, 2001·No. [P.C. No. 25, September Term, 1959.]·Published

Opinion

221 Md. 581 (1959)
155 A.2d 652

COTHORN
v.
WARDEN OF MARYLAND PENITENTIARY

[P.C. No. 25, September Term, 1959.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided November 23, 1959.

*582 Before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

The applicant was convicted under three separate indictments of three separate offenses — robbery, unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, and assault. None of the individual sentences exceeded the maximum authorized by law. Separate offenses may be punished separately. Williams v. State, 205 Md. 470, 109 A.2d 89. A disparity between the sentence imposed upon the applicant and that imposed upon his codefendant affords no basis for relief under the Post Conviction Procedure Act.

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cothorn v. Warden, 155 A.2d 652, 221 Md. 581 (Md. 2001).

155 A.2d 652 (Cothorn v. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
109 A.2d 89 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)
Cothorn v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
155 A.2d 652 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1959)