Cothorn v. Warden

155 A.2d 652, 221 Md. 581
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedSeptember 25, 2001
Docket[P.C. No. 25, September Term, 1959.]
StatusPublished

This text of 155 A.2d 652 (Cothorn v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cothorn v. Warden, 155 A.2d 652, 221 Md. 581 (Md. 2001).

Opinion

221 Md. 581 (1959)
155 A.2d 652

COTHORN
v.
WARDEN OF MARYLAND PENITENTIARY

[P.C. No. 25, September Term, 1959.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided November 23, 1959.

*582 Before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

The applicant was convicted under three separate indictments of three separate offenses — robbery, unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, and assault. None of the individual sentences exceeded the maximum authorized by law. Separate offenses may be punished separately. Williams v. State, 205 Md. 470, 109 A.2d 89. A disparity between the sentence imposed upon the applicant and that imposed upon his codefendant affords no basis for relief under the Post Conviction Procedure Act.

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. State
109 A.2d 89 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)
Cothorn v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
155 A.2d 652 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
155 A.2d 652, 221 Md. 581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cothorn-v-warden-md-2001.