Cothorn v. Warden
This text of 155 A.2d 652 (Cothorn v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COTHORN
v.
WARDEN OF MARYLAND PENITENTIARY
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
*582 Before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ.
PER CURIAM:
The applicant was convicted under three separate indictments of three separate offenses robbery, unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, and assault. None of the individual sentences exceeded the maximum authorized by law. Separate offenses may be punished separately. Williams v. State, 205 Md. 470, 109 A.2d 89. A disparity between the sentence imposed upon the applicant and that imposed upon his codefendant affords no basis for relief under the Post Conviction Procedure Act.
Application denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
155 A.2d 652, 221 Md. 581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cothorn-v-warden-md-2001.