Cory v. Cory

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cory v. Cory

476 So. 2d 1298, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2431, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15624

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 3, 1985

DocketNo. 85-28

StatusPublished

This text of 476 So. 2d 1298 (Cory v. Cory) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cory v. Cory, 476 So. 2d 1298, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2431, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15624 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The mother appeals a trial court order approving the general master’s recommendation that the minor children of the parties not be removed from the United States under any circumstances, the effect of which in this instance was to deny Mrs. Cory the right to take the parties’ son Kevin to Japan to visit his maternal grandparents. We reverse this order because the record before the master contains no evidence to substantiate the father’s alleged concern that Mrs. Cory, a resident of the United States for the last quarter century, will remain in Japan with the boy. The case is remanded to the trial court for the purpose of fixing an appropriate time for this visit and its duration. In all other respects, the trial court’s order is affirmed, and the custody of Kevin shall remain with the father.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part, and remanded.

SCHWARTZ, C.J., and DANIEL S. PEARSON, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The mother appeals a trial court order approving the general master’s recommendation that the minor children of the parties not be removed from the United States under any circumstances, the effect of which in this instance was to deny Mrs. Cory the right to take the parties’ son Kevin to Japan to visit his maternal grandparents. We reverse this order because the record before the master contains no evidence to substantiate the father’s alleged concern that Mrs. Cory, a resident of the United States for the last quarter century, will remain in Japan with the boy. The case is remanded to the trial court for the purpose of fixing an appropriate time for this visit and its duration. In all other respects, the trial court’s order is affirmed, and the custody of Kevin shall remain with the father.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part, and remanded.

SCHWARTZ, C.J., and DANIEL S. PEARSON, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

476 So. 2d 1298, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2431, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cory-v-cory-fladistctapp-1985.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack