Besade v. Besade
This text of 430 So. 2d 927 (Besade v. Besade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Alfred R. BESADE, Jr., Appellant,
v.
Linda R. BESADE, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Koppen & Watkins and George M. Evans and George J. Lott, Miami, for appellant.
Schwartz, Klein, Steinhardt & Weiss, Miami, for appellee.
Before NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
In the final judgment of dissolution, the wife was awarded custody of the minor children. Subsequently, that provision of the judgment was modified and custody awarded to the paternal grandparents. Several years later, the wife filed a petition for custody of the minors. The husband actively defended the petition for change of custody which, after a hearing, was granted. The wife's attorneys were then awarded fees for their services. Under these circumstances, Section 61.16, Florida Statutes (1981) clearly empowered the court to require the husband to pay the wife's attorneys' fees.
We are unable to consider the remaining points on appeal regarding: (a) the wife's financial ability to pay her own attorneys; or (b) the reasonableness and propriety of the fees awarded, because no record of the evidentiary hearing was made nor has any substantial record thereof been provided to the court. Fla.R.App.P. *928 9.200(a)(3); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1979); Blynder v. Blynder, 294 So.2d 717 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
430 So. 2d 927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/besade-v-besade-fladistctapp-1983.