Cortinez v. Flournoy
385 U.S. 925
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 7, 1966
DocketNo. 871
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases
This text of 385 U.S. 925 (Cortinez v. Flournoy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cortinez v. Flournoy, 385 U.S. 925 (1966).
Opinion
Motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus denied. Treating the papers submitted as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Newell v. State
277 A.2d 731 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1971)
Rodriguez v. Rosenblatt
277 A.2d 216 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1971)
Application of Stevenson
458 P.2d 414 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1969)
State Ex Rel. Plutshack v. Department of Health & Social Services
155 N.W.2d 549 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1968)
State v. Borst
154 N.W.2d 888 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1967)
MacDonnel v. Commonwealth
230 N.E.2d 821 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1967)
Irvin v. State
203 So. 2d 283 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1967)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
385 U.S. 925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cortinez-v-flournoy-scotus-1966.