Corsini v. Corsini
This text of 178 A.D.2d 356 (Corsini v. Corsini) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J.), entered December 5, 1990, which, to the extent appealed from, denied [357]*357defendant’s motion to modify a prior order of the same court directing defendant to pay tuition and school related expenses for the parties’ children, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
In light of the conflicting affidavits of the parties, as well as the inconsistencies apparent on the face of defendant’s own submissions, a prompt trial, where the facts may be examined in far greater detail and where a more accurate appraisal of the situations of the parties may be obtained, is defendant’s proper remedy for determining whether he should continue to pay the tuition and other expenses related to the attendance of the parties’ children at the private elementary school (Sayer v Sayer, 130 AD2d 407, 408). Concur—Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Ross and Rubin, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
178 A.D.2d 356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corsini-v-corsini-nyappdiv-1991.