Corr v. Philadelphia

61 A. 808, 212 Pa. 123, 1905 Pa. LEXIS 565
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 15, 1905·No. Appeal, No. 53·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam,

An abandonment of land appropriated by a municipality for public use cannot be established by proof merely of a failure for the time to use it, or of a temporary use of it not inconsistent with an intention to use it for the purpose for which it was taken, or another public purpose. The facts alleged in support of the averment of abandonment do not strengthen it. But there is a distinct averment of an actual abandonment of any intention to use the land for any public purpose. This we think was a sufficiently well pleaded abandonment to put the city to a defense. The order sustaining the demurrer and entering judgment for the defendant is reversed with leave to the defendant to answer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Corr v. Philadelphia, 61 A. 808, 212 Pa. 123, 1905 Pa. LEXIS 565 (Pa. 1905).

61 A. 808 (Corr v. Philadelphia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Board of Zoning Appeals
459 A.2d 1350 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1983)
Upper Darby Township Appeal
138 A.2d 99 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1958)
Marple Township v. Tarquinio
81 Pa. D. & C. 210 (Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, 1951)
Haller Baking Company's Appeal
145 A. 77 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1928)