Corpuel v. Galasso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Corpuel v. Galasso

240 A.D.2d 530, 659 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6600

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 16, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 240 A.D.2d 530 (Corpuel v. Galasso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Corpuel v. Galasso, 240 A.D.2d 530, 659 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6600 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover the proceeds of a promissory note, Nancy Galasso appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), dated January 5,1996, which denied her motion to vacate an order of the same court entered July 17, 1995, which, inter alia, found her in contempt of court and fined her $1,412,800.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

[531]*531The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of the judgment entered April 10, 1996 (see, Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the order made upon the appellant’s motion to vacate the judgment (see, CPLR 5501 [a] [1]; Corpuel v Galasso, 240 AD2d 531 [decided herewith]). Thompson, J. P., Florio, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover the proceeds of a promissory note, Nancy Galasso appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), dated January 5,1996, which denied her motion to vacate an order of the same court entered July 17, 1995, which, inter alia, found her in contempt of court and fined her $1,412,800.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

[531]*531The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of the judgment entered April 10, 1996 (see, Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the order made upon the appellant’s motion to vacate the judgment (see, CPLR 5501 [a] [1]; Corpuel v Galasso, 240 AD2d 531 [decided herewith]). Thompson, J. P., Florio, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 A.D.2d 530, 659 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corpuel-v-galasso-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack