Corporation of the Royal Exchange Assurance of London v. Franklin
This text of 124 S.E. 391 (Corporation of the Royal Exchange Assurance of London v. Franklin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Applying to this case (a suit upon a policy of fire-insurance) the answers of the Supreme Court to certified questions in the case (158 Ga. 644, 124 S. E. 172), the verdict found for the plaintiff for the value of the property destroyed, and attorney’s fees, was authorized under the law and the evidence, and the court did not err in overruling the defendant’s motion for a new trial upon any of the general or special grounds therein contained.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
124 S.E. 391, 32 Ga. App. 637, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corporation-of-the-royal-exchange-assurance-of-london-v-franklin-gactapp-1924.