Corporation of the Presiding Bishop v. City of Porterville
338 U.S. 805, 70 S. Ct. 78, 94 L. Ed. 487, 1949 U.S. LEXIS 1888
Opinion
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Corporation of the Presiding Bishop v. City of Porterville, 338 U.S. 805, 70 S. Ct. 78, 94 L. Ed. 487, 1949 U.S. LEXIS 1888 (1949).
338 U.S. 805 (Corporation of the Presiding Bishop v. City of Porterville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lucas Valley Homeowners Assn. v. County of Marin
233 Cal. App. 3d 130 (California Court of Appeal, 1991)
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. Jefferson County
741 F. Supp. 1522 (N.D. Alabama, 1990)
Armin Grosz, Sarah Grosz and Naftali Grosz v. The City of Miami Beach, Florida
721 F.2d 729 (Eleventh Circuit, 1983)
Kacar, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board
432 A.2d 310 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1981)
Jewish Reconstructionist Synagogue of the North Shore, Inc. v. Incorporated Village of Roslyn Harbor
342 N.E.2d 534 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
Town of Los Altos Hills v. Adobe Creek Properties, Inc.
32 Cal. App. 3d 488 (California Court of Appeal, 1973)
State ex rel. Lake Drive Baptist Church v. Village of Bayside Board of Trustees
108 N.W.2d 288 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1961)
Minney v. City of Azusa
330 P.2d 255 (California Court of Appeal, 1958)
Jehovah's Witnesses Appeal
130 A.2d 240 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1957)
Bd. of Zoning Ap. of Decatur v. Decatur, Ind. Co. of Jehovah's Witnesses
117 N.E.2d 115 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1954)
American Communications Assn. v. Douds
339 U.S. 382 (Supreme Court, 1950)