Coronet Capital Co. v. Spodek

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Coronet Capital Co. v. Spodek

279 A.D.2d 602, 719 N.Y.S.2d 870, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 958

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 29, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 279 A.D.2d 602 (Coronet Capital Co. v. Spodek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coronet Capital Co. v. Spodek, 279 A.D.2d 602, 719 N.Y.S.2d 870, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 958 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants Rosalind T. Spodek and J. Leonard Spodek appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (G. Aronin, J.), dated November 15, 1999, which denied their motion for reargument and renewal of their prior motion which was denied by an order of the same court, dated March 9, 1999.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as denied reargument is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as denied renewal is dismissed as academic; and it is further,

Ordered that the nonparty respondent is awarded one bill of costs.

The appeal from so much of the order as denied renewal is dismissed as academic in light of our determination in Coronet [603]*603Capital Co. v Spodek (279 AD2d 600 [decided herewith]). Ritter, J. P., H. Miller, Feuerstein and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI