Corning v. Roosevelt

10 N.Y.S. 937, 18 N.Y. Civ. Proc. R. 193, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1074
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Corning v. Roosevelt. Read the opinion of the Court — 11 N.Y.S. 758
New York Supreme Court·Decided March 31, 1890·Published

Opinion

Andrews, J.

As no copy of the affidavit of merits was served; plaintiff has the right to disregard it. Code Civil Proc. § 782; Rule 24. The judgment was heretofore regularly entered, and the defendant is in default. Such default will be opened so far as to permit a defense of the action upon payment of plaintiff’s costs and disbursements; the answer to be served within . 10 days, and the judgment to stand as security. The order will be settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Corning v. Roosevelt, 10 N.Y.S. 937, 18 N.Y. Civ. Proc. R. 193, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1074 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1890).

10 N.Y.S. 937 (Corning v. Roosevelt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.