Corning v. Roosevelt

New York Supreme Court

Corning v. Roosevelt

10 N.Y.S. 937, 18 N.Y. Civ. Proc. R. 193, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1074

DecidedMarch 31, 1890

StatusPublished

This text of 10 N.Y.S. 937 (Corning v. Roosevelt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Corning v. Roosevelt, 10 N.Y.S. 937, 18 N.Y. Civ. Proc. R. 193, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1074 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1890).

Pincite

Opinion

Andrews, J.

As no copy of the affidavit of merits was served; plaintiff has the right to disregard it. Code Civil Proc. § 782; Rule 24. The judgment was heretofore regularly entered, and the defendant is in default. Such default will be opened so far as to permit a defense of the action upon payment of plaintiff’s costs and disbursements; the answer to be served within . 10 days, and the judgment to stand as security. The order will be settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Andrews, J.

As no copy of the affidavit of merits was served; plaintiff has the right to disregard it. Code Civil Proc. § 782; Rule 24. The judgment was heretofore regularly entered, and the defendant is in default. Such default will be opened so far as to permit a defense of the action upon payment of plaintiff’s costs and disbursements; the answer to be served within . 10 days, and the judgment to stand as security. The order will be settled on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 N.Y.S. 937, 18 N.Y. Civ. Proc. R. 193, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1074, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corning-v-roosevelt-nysupct-1890.