Cormack v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

261 So. 2d 230, 261 La. 824, 1972 La. LEXIS 5110
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 11, 1972·No. No. 52392·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

[826] We find no error of law in the Court of Appeal judgment.

DIXON, J., is of the opinion that the writ should issue. The policy provision as interpreted by the court of appeal gives a benefit for dental treatment that is largely illusory.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cormack v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America, 261 So. 2d 230, 261 La. 824, 1972 La. LEXIS 5110 (La. 1972).

261 So. 2d 230 (Cormack v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Touchstone v. Land & Marine Applicators, Inc.
628 F. Supp. 1202 (E.D. Louisiana, 1986)
Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. Pinelli
466 So. 2d 731 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1985)
Armstrong v. Land & Marine Applicators, Inc.
463 So. 2d 1331 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1984)
Richard v. Board of Trustees
411 So. 2d 491 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1982)
Frank v. Continental States Auto Club, Inc.
407 So. 2d 10 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1981)
Matherne v. Prudential Ins. Co.
362 So. 2d 823 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1978)
Fontenot v. New York Life Ins. Co.
357 So. 2d 1185 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1978)
Hill v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.
357 So. 2d 61 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1978)
American Hardware Mut. Ins. Co. v. Stine
341 So. 2d 1301 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1977)