Corley v. Collins

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided October 3, 2023·No. 1:23-cv-00479·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

JEFFREY CORLEY, Petitioner, 23 CIVIL 0479 (LIL) -against- JUDGMENT CHRIS COLLINS, Respondent. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated October 2, 2023, Respondent's motion to dismiss without prejudice, Dkt. No. 18 is GRANTED, and the Petition for habeas corpus relief is DISMISSED without prejudice to Petitioner filing a new petition after he has exhausted his state- court remedies. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this opinion and order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). DATED: New York, New York October 03, 2023

RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: ¢ Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Corley v. Collins, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Corley v. Collins (Corley v. Collins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)