Corley v. Cepada
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MARQUIS CORLEY, Plaintiff, 25-CV-0770 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL N. CEPADA, Defendant. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: By order dated February 10, 2025, the Court directed Plaintiff, within thirty days, to submit an amended request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) or pay the $405.00 in fees required to file a civil action in this court. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an amended IFP application or paid the fees. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). The Court directs the Clerk of Court to enter judgment in this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: April 14, 2025 New York, New York
/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Corley v. Cepada (Corley v. Cepada) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.