Cordova Carballo v. Rosa, Jr.

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 SANDOR ANIVAL CORDOVA Case No.: 2:20-cv-02196-APG-BNW CARBALLO, et al., 4 Order Granting Unopposed Motion to Plaintiffs Dismiss 5 v. [ECF No. 30] 6 LUIS ROSA, JR., et al., 7 Defendants 8

9 Defendant Luis Rosa, Jr. moves to dismiss on a variety of grounds. The plaintiffs did not 10 respond. Consequently, I grant the motion as unopposed. LR 7-2(d). 11 I THEREFORE ORDER that defendant Luis Rosa, Jr.’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 30) 12 is GRANTED as follows: 13 ● Urvano Ruiz Sanchez is dismissed because he is not named in the caption. 14 ● The Fifth Amendment claims for the following plaintiffs are dismissed because they 15 are no longer housed at Nevada Southern Detention Center: Hector Perez Alvarez, Mojahamed 16 Betiche, Bambang Budiano, Sandor Anival Cordova Carballo, Jose Rodolfo Castallanos, Jose 17 Seron Figueroa, Edgar Ramirez Garcia, Eduardo Gallardo Gonzalez, Jerrado Guerrora, 18 Suhamma Kukulpane, Julian Martin, Israel Mendoza, and Yupanqui Sanchez. 19 ● Plaintiffs Felipe Mora and David Garcia Flores’s Fifth Amendment claim against 20 defendant Rosa are dismissed for failure to allege that Rosa violated their Fifth Amendment 21 rights. 22 23 ] e All plaintiffs’ Eighth Amendment claims are dismissed for failure to state a claim against defendant Rosa under Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). 4 e All plaintiffs’ intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress claims are dismissed for failure to state a claim against defendant Rosa. 6 I FURTHER ORDER the clerk of court to terminate defendant Luis Rosa, Jr. as a 7\| defendant in this action. 8 DATED this 29th day of October, 2021. 9 □□□ ANDREWP.GORDON SS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23