Cordova Carballo v. Rosa, Jr.

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided September 3, 2021·No. 2:20-cv-02196·Unknown

Opinion

SANDOR ANIVAL CORDOVA Case No.: 2:20-cv-02196-APG-BNW CARBALLO, et al. Order Accepting Report and Plaintiffs Recommendation v. [ECF No. 17] WILLIAM BARR, et al., Defendants

The plaintiffs moved for leave to file a second amended complaint. ECF No. 6. Magistrate Judge Weksler granted that motion in part, allowing the plaintiffs to add some claims but recommending that I deny leave to amend several other claims because they would be futile. ECF No. 17 at 11. No objection has been filed as to that recommendation. I am not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The Ninth Circuit has confirmed that a district court is not required to review a magistrate judge’s recommendation where no objection has been filed. See United States v. Reyna–Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (“[T]he district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise.”); see also Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) (Based on Thomas and Reyna–Tapia, “district courts are not required to conduct any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.”). Because there is no objection to Judge Weksler’s recommendation, I may accept it without review. I THEREFORE ORDER that Judge Weksler’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 17) is accepted. The plaintiff’s motion to amend (ECF No. 6) is denied in part as follows: ] * amendment to add plaintiff Yassine Fadi is denied as futile; * amendment as to Count 2 is denied as futile; 3 * amendment as to Count 3 is denied as futile as against all defendants except Koehn, Lauer, and Simic; 5 * amendment as to Count 4 is denied as futile as against all defendants except Koehn, 6 Lauer, and Simic; 7 * amendment as to Count 5 is denied as futile as against all defendants except Koehn, Lauer, and Simic; 9 * amendment to assert a § 1983 claim against the CoreCivic employees is denied as futile. Judge Weksler previously granted the remainder of the motion to amend so no further action is needed from me at this time. ECF No. 17 at 11. DATED this 3rd day of September, 2021. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cordova Carballo v. Rosa, Jr., (D. Nev. 2021).

Cordova Carballo v. Rosa, Jr. (Cordova Carballo v. Rosa, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. Arn
474 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 1986)
Schmidt v. Johnstone
263 F. Supp. 2d 1219 (D. Arizona, 2003)