Corcoran v. City of Chicago
This text of 311 U.S. 610 (Corcoran v. City of Chicago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 53; Hiawassee Power Co. v. Carolina-Tenn. Co., 252 U. S. 341, 344; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700. (2) Escanaba & Lake Michigan Co. v. Chicago, 107 U. S. 678, 688-689; Permoli v. First Municipality, 3 How. 589, 610; Cincinnati v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co., 223 U. S. 390, 401. (3) Pearson v. Yewdall, 95 U. S. 294, 296; Minneapolis & St. Louis R. Co. v. Bombolis, 241 U. S. 211, 217.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
311 U.S. 610, 61 S. Ct. 45, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corcoran-v-city-of-chicago-scotus-1940.