Corcoran v. City of Chicago

Supreme Court

Corcoran v. City of Chicago

311 U.S. 610, 61 S. Ct. 45

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 14, 1940·No. No. 326·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 53; Hiawassee Power Co. v. Carolina-Tenn. Co., 252 U. S. 341, 344; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700. (2) Escanaba & Lake Michigan Co. v. Chicago, 107 U. S. 678, 688-689; Permoli v. First Municipality, 3 How. 589, 610; Cincinnati v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co., 223 U. S. 390, 401. (3) Pearson v. Yewdall, 95 U. S. 294, 296; Minneapolis & St. Louis R. Co. v. Bombolis, 241 U. S. 211, 217.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 53; Hiawassee Power Co. v. Carolina-Tenn. Co., 252 U. S. 341, 344; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700. (2) Escanaba & Lake Michigan Co. v. Chicago, 107 U. S. 678, 688-689; Permoli v. First Municipality, 3 How. 589, 610; Cincinnati v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co., 223 U. S. 390, 401. (3) Pearson v. Yewdall, 95 U. S. 294, 296; Minneapolis & St. Louis R. Co. v. Bombolis, 241 U. S. 211, 217.

Corcoran v. City of Chicago, 311 U.S. 610, 61 S. Ct. 45 (1940).

Pincite

311 U.S. 610 (Corcoran v. City of Chicago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related