Corbitt v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Corbitt v. State

43 So. 3d 875, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12907, 2010 WL 3446867

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Corbitt v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 9875 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 3, 2010·No. No. 5D09-2386·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Donald Corbitt’s convictions and sentences but remand the judgment for correction of a scrivener’s error. The judgment states that Corbitt pled no contest to aggravated battery and robbery with a deadly weapon. In fact, Corbitt pled not guilty and was convicted of these offenses following a trial. On remand, the judgment must be corrected.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED to correct scrivener’s error.

SAWAYA, ORFINGER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Donald Corbitt’s convictions and sentences but remand the judgment for correction of a scrivener’s error. The judgment states that Corbitt pled no contest to aggravated battery and robbery with a deadly weapon. In fact, Corbitt pled not guilty and was convicted of these offenses following a trial. On remand, the judgment must be corrected.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED to correct scrivener’s error.

SAWAYA, ORFINGER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Corbitt v. State, 43 So. 3d 875, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12907, 2010 WL 3446867 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

43 So. 3d 875 (Corbitt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.