Corbitt v. State
This text of 985 So. 2d 656 (Corbitt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant, Wanda L. Corbitt, challenges her convictions for trafficking in methamphetamine and possession of a listed chemical on several grounds. We agree that the trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress because the officers’ uninvited and warrantless entry into the side and backyard areas was unlawful. Waldo v. State, 975 So.2d 542, 543 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). For this reason, Appellant’s convictions must be reversed. As a result, we need not address the other issues raised by Appellant.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
985 So. 2d 656, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 9875, 2008 WL 2547217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corbitt-v-state-fladistctapp-2008.