Corbitt v. State
985 So. 2d 656, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 9875, 2008 WL 2547217
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 27, 2008·No. No. 1D06-4241·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Appellant, Wanda L. Corbitt, challenges her convictions for trafficking in methamphetamine and possession of a listed chemical on several grounds. We agree that the trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress because the officers’ uninvited and warrantless entry into the side and backyard areas was unlawful. Waldo v. State, 975 So.2d 542, 543 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). For this reason, Appellant’s convictions must be reversed. As a result, we need not address the other issues raised by Appellant.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Corbitt v. State, 985 So. 2d 656, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 9875, 2008 WL 2547217 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).
985 So. 2d 656 (Corbitt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Brady
985 So. 2d 656 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)