Corbitt v. State

697 So. 2d 1310, 1997 WL 473682
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 20, 1997·No. 96-3697·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

697 So.2d 1310 (1997)

Anthony CORBITT, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 96-3697.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

August 20, 1997.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Ellen Griffin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

While we affirm appellant's sentences for robbery with a firearm and burglary while armed with a firearm, the State concedes, and we agree, that appellant's habitual felony offender sentence for kidnapping with a firearm must be reversed. Appellant committed the offense in 1991, when the habitual offender statute did not provide for the enhancement of life felonies. See § 775.084(4), Fla. Stat. (1991); Lamont v. State, 610 So.2d 435, 439 (Fla.1992).[1] In resentencing appellant on remand, the trial court may exceed the sentencing guidelines if there are valid grounds to do so. See Grant v. State, 677 So.2d 45 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART.

STONE, C.J., and POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

NOTES

[1] Under the 1991 statutes, kidnapping is a first degree felony which is reclassified as a life felony when a firearm is used. See §§ 775.087(1)(a), 787.01(2), Fla. Stat. (1991).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Corbitt v. State, 697 So. 2d 1310, 1997 WL 473682 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

697 So. 2d 1310 (Corbitt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Griffin v. State
934 So. 2d 614 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Beatrice v. State
832 So. 2d 972 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Austin v. State
756 So. 2d 1080 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)