Corbitt v. State
This text of 697 So. 2d 1310 (Corbitt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Anthony CORBITT, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Ellen Griffin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
While we affirm appellant's sentences for robbery with a firearm and burglary while armed with a firearm, the State concedes, and we agree, that appellant's habitual felony offender sentence for kidnapping with a firearm must be reversed. Appellant committed the offense in 1991, when the habitual offender statute did not provide for the enhancement of life felonies. See § 775.084(4), Fla. Stat. (1991); Lamont v. State, 610 So.2d 435, 439 (Fla.1992).[1] In resentencing appellant on remand, the trial court may exceed the sentencing guidelines if there are valid grounds to do so. See Grant v. State, 677 So.2d 45 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART.
STONE, C.J., and POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
NOTES
[1] Under the 1991 statutes, kidnapping is a first degree felony which is reclassified as a life felony when a firearm is used. See §§ 775.087(1)(a), 787.01(2), Fla. Stat. (1991).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
697 So. 2d 1310, 1997 WL 473682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corbitt-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.