Austin v. State

790 So. 2d 433, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2197, 2000 WL 241810
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 6, 2000
DocketNo. 1D98-3180
StatusPublished

This text of 790 So. 2d 433 (Austin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Austin v. State, 790 So. 2d 433, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2197, 2000 WL 241810 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises four issues on appeal, none of which has merit, and only one of which needs to be briefly discussed. ' Appellant challenges section 775.082(8), Florida Statutes (the Prison Releasee Reoffen-der Punishment Act), as being violative of the separation of powers clause of the Florida Constitution. We reject this challenge. See Woods v. State, 740 So.2d 20 [434]*434(Fla. 1st DCA); rev. granted, 740 So.2d 529 (Fla.1999). As we did in Woods, however, we certify the following question as being one of great public importance:

DOES THE PRISON RELEASEE REOFFENDER PUNISHMENT ACT, CODIFIED AS SECTION 775.082(8), FLORIDA STATUTES (1997), VIOLATE THE SEPARATION OF POWERS CLAUSE OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION?

Affirmed.

ALLEN, WOLF and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Woods v. State
740 So. 2d 20 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
790 So. 2d 433, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2197, 2000 WL 241810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.