Corbitt v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Corbitt v. State

650 So. 2d 1051, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 90, 1995 WL 7659

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 11, 1995

DocketNo. 92-3276

StatusPublished

This text of 650 So. 2d 1051 (Corbitt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Corbitt v. State, 650 So. 2d 1051, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 90, 1995 WL 7659 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Anthony Corbitt, was tried by jury and convicted of robbery with a firearm, armed kidnapping and armed burglary. His ease was assigned to the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit’s special habitual felony offender division of the circuit court. Appellant was declared an habitual felony offender and sentenced to life in prison for the armed robbery and armed kidnapping charges and to thirty years in prison for the armed burglary offense. In accordance with Hartley v. State, 650 So.2d 1044 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), we affirm appellant’s conviction but vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing before a different trial judge. We have considered the other issues raised by appellant and find no error.

POLEN, FARMER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Anthony Corbitt, was tried by jury and convicted of robbery with a firearm, armed kidnapping and armed burglary. His ease was assigned to the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit’s special habitual felony offender division of the circuit court. Appellant was declared an habitual felony offender and sentenced to life in prison for the armed robbery and armed kidnapping charges and to thirty years in prison for the armed burglary offense. In accordance with Hartley v. State, 650 So.2d 1044 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), we affirm appellant’s conviction but vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing before a different trial judge. We have considered the other issues raised by appellant and find no error.

POLEN, FARMER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

650 So. 2d 1051, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 90, 1995 WL 7659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corbitt-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack