Corbin v. Van Brunt

Supreme Court

Corbin v. Van Brunt

12 F. 639

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Corbin v. Van Brunt. Read the opinion of the Court — 105 U.S. 576 →

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 15, 1881·Published

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court, affirming the order of the circuit court.

Where the real controversy is about the right to the possession of land, and so far as the title is concerned it appears that citizens of. the state jn which suit is brought are the only parties interested, and they occupy both sides of that controversy, the cause is not removable under the second clause of section 2 of the act of 1875, as there are no separate .controversies, suchas admit of separate and distinct trials.

Cases cited in opinion: The Removal Cases, 100 U. S. 457; Blake v. McKim, 103 U. S. 336; Hyde v. Ruble, 3 Morr. Tr. 516.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court, affirming the order of the circuit court.

Where the real controversy is about the right to the possession of land, and so far as the title is concerned it appears that citizens of. the state jn which suit is brought are the only parties interested, and they occupy both sides of that controversy, the cause is not removable under the second clause of section 2 of the act of 1875, as there are no separate .controversies, suchas admit of separate and distinct trials.

Cases cited in opinion: The Removal Cases, 100 U. S. 457; Blake v. McKim, 103 U. S. 336; Hyde v. Ruble, 3 Morr. Tr. 516.

Corbin v. Van Brunt, 12 F. 639 (U.S. 1881).

Pincite

12 F. 639 (Corbin v. Van Brunt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related