Corbin v. Blankenburg

Sixth Circuit

Corbin v. Blankenburg

999 F.2d 1043, 1993 WL 405999

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Corbin v. Blankenburg. Read the opinion of the Court — 39 F.3d 650 →

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided October 4, 1993·No. No. 92-1540·Published

Opinion

ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this ease en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this ease for oral argument as soon as possible.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this ease en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this ease for oral argument as soon as possible.

Corbin v. Blankenburg, 999 F.2d 1043, 1993 WL 405999 (6th Cir. 1993).

Pincite

999 F.2d 1043 (Corbin v. Blankenburg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.