Corbett v. Chandler
202 F.2d 428
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided February 20, 1953·No. No. 11623·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the arguments of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised,
Now, therefore, it is ordered that the order of the District Court dismissing appellants’ complaint be and is hereby affirmed. See Kowalski v. Chandler, 6 Cir., 202 F.2d 413.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Corbett v. Chandler, 202 F.2d 428 (6th Cir. 1953).
202 F.2d 428 (Corbett v. Chandler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Right Field Rooftops, LLC v. Chicago Baseball Holdings, LLC
87 F. Supp. 3d 874 (N.D. Illinois, 2015)
Butterworth v. NAT. BASEBALL CLUBS
644 So. 2d 1021 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)
Piazza v. Major League Baseball
831 F. Supp. 420 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1993)
Flood v. Kuhn
407 U.S. 258 (Supreme Court, 1972)
Corbett v. Chandler
202 F.2d 428 (Sixth Circuit, 1953)