Corbett & Stuart v. Commissioner

11 B.T.A. 540, 1928 BTA LEXIS 3786
United States Board of Tax Appeals·Decided April 12, 1928·No. Docket No. 11855.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[541] OPINION.

Smith

: The question presented by this proceeding has been before the Board in L. S. Ayers & Co., 1 B. T. A. 1135, wherein we held that the invested capital of a corporation might not be reduced in determining the extent to which a dividend is paid from current earnings of a year by a “ tentative tax ” theoretically set aside out of such earnings pro rata over such year. The position there taken was reaffirmed in All America Cables, Inc., 10 B. T. A. 213. These decisions are controlling in this case.

Judgment will be entered on 15 days’ notice, wider Rule 50.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Corbett & Stuart v. Commissioner, 11 B.T.A. 540, 1928 BTA LEXIS 3786 (bta 1928).

11 B.T.A. 540 (Corbett & Stuart v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Corbett & Stuart v. Commissioner
11 B.T.A. 540 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1928)