Corben Rane Hinton v. State of Arkansas
This text of Corben Rane Hinton v. State of Arkansas (Corben Rane Hinton v. State of Arkansas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cite as 2026 Ark. App. 312 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV No. CR-25-766
CORBEN RANE HINTON Opinion Delivered: May 20, 2026
APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE MILLER COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V. [NO. 46CR-23-548]
STATE OF ARKANSAS HONORABLE L. WREN AUTREY, APPELLEE JUDGE
AFFIRMED; MOTION TO BE RELIEVED GRANTED
RAYMOND R. ABRAMSON, Judge
Corben Rane Hinton appeals the Miller County Circuit Court’s order revoking his
probation. Hinton’s counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and a no-merit brief pursuant
to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-3(b)(1), stating that no
meritorious grounds support an appeal. The clerk of this court mailed a certified copy of
counsel’s motion and brief to Hinton informing him of his rights to file pro se points for
reversal, but Hinton has not filed any such points in this case.
For the reasons discussed in Hinton v. State, 2026 Ark. App. 311, ___ S.W.3d ___,
also handed down today, we hold that counsel’s brief complies with the directives of Anders
and Rule 4-3(b)(1) and that no issues of arguable merit support an appeal. Accordingly, we
affirm the conviction and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. Affirmed; motion to be relieved granted.
MURPHY and BROWN, JJ., agree.
Phillip A. McGough, P.A., by: Phillip A. McGough, for appellant.
One brief only.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Corben Rane Hinton v. State of Arkansas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corben-rane-hinton-v-state-of-arkansas-arkctapp-2026.