Coppola v. O'Brien
This text of 691 F. App'x 725 (Coppola v. O'Brien) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
In these consolidated appeals, Joseph Coppola, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice. Coppola also appeals the court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in either order. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Coppola v. O’Brien, No. 3:15-cv-00096-GMG-RWT, 2016 WL 4702441 (N.D. W. Va. Sept. 8, 2016; Dec. 7, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
691 F. App'x 725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coppola-v-obrien-ca4-2017.