Coppola v. O'Brien

667 F. App'x 41
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 23, 2016·No. No. 16-6138·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Coppola seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying his motion for entry of default on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Coppola seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coppola v. O'Brien, 667 F. App'x 41 (4th Cir. 2016).

667 F. App'x 41 (Coppola v. O'Brien) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)