Copeland v. Housing Authority of Spartanburg

316 S.E.2d 408, 282 S.C. 8, 1984 S.C. LEXIS 305
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided May 24, 1984·No. 22115·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinions

Littlejohn, Chief Justice:

The plaintiff-respondent, Peggy Copeland, brings this action against The Housing Authority of Spartanburg, South Carolina. She alleges that she is entitled to recover damages because of the negligence of the defendant in failing to repair a gas furnace which emitted flames causing her furniture to be burned. The trial judge overruled the Demurrer of the City in effect overruling the doctrine of sovereign immunity. We reverse.

We hold that this doctrine of sovereign immunity is still applicable in South Carolina. If the law is to be changed, such change should come from the legislature. We reaffirmed this doctrine in Belue v. The City of Spartanburg, 276 S. C. 381, 280 S. E. (2d) 49 (1981). The Demurrer should have been sustained and the order of the lower court is

Reversed.

Gregory, J., and J. Woodrow Lewis, as Acting Associate Justice, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Copeland v. Housing Authority of Spartanburg, 316 S.E.2d 408, 282 S.C. 8, 1984 S.C. LEXIS 305 (S.C. 1984).

316 S.E.2d 408 (Copeland v. Housing Authority of Spartanburg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Russo v. Sutton
422 S.E.2d 750 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1992)
McCall ex rel. Andrews v. Batson
329 S.E.2d 741 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1985)
McCall v. Batson
329 S.E.2d 741 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1985)
Newberry v. Georgia Department of Industry & Trade
322 S.E.2d 212 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1984)
Newberry v. GA. DEPT. OF IND. AND TRADE
322 S.E.2d 212 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1984)
Copeland v. Housing Authority of Spartanburg
316 S.E.2d 408 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1984)