Coopersmith v. State
162 So. 3d 68, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12995
This text of 162 So. 3d 68 (Coopersmith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Coopersmith v. State, 162 So. 3d 68, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12995 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).
Opinion
Louis Coopersmith appeals his judgment and sentence after his probation was revoked. We affirm. However, we remand for the order of revocation to be corrected to list the conditions that Coopersmith was found to have violated. See Baker v. State, 133 So.3d 1209 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014).
Affirmed; remanded with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Baker v. State
133 So. 3d 1209 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
162 So. 3d 68, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12995, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coopersmith-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.