Baker v. State

133 So. 3d 1209, 2014 WL 962080, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3489
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 12, 2014
DocketNo. 2D13-2491
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 133 So. 3d 1209 (Baker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baker v. State, 133 So. 3d 1209, 2014 WL 962080, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3489 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

KHOUZAM, Judge.

Edward Baker appeals his judgment and sentence entered after his probation was revoked. The conditions of probation listed in the amended revocation order do not appear to conform to the circuit court’s oral findings regarding which conditions Baker violated. Because a violation of any of these conditions would justify revoca[1210]*1210tion, we affirm. However, we remand for the amended revocation order to be corrected to list the conditions that Baker was found to have violated.

Affirmed; remanded with directions.

ALTENBERND and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coopersmith v. State
162 So. 3d 68 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 So. 3d 1209, 2014 WL 962080, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.