Cooper v. Nan Ya Plastics

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 27, 2007·No. 06-2088·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-2088

ROY T. COOPER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

NAN YA PLASTICS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:04-cv-21823-TLW)

Submitted: February 22, 2007 Decided: February 27, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roy T. Cooper, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Pharr Pearson, Cheryl Lynne Behymer, FISHER & PHILLIPS, LLP, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Roy T. Cooper appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing

the employment discrimination action Cooper brought against his

former employer, Nan Ya Plastics. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. (Cooper v. Nan Ya Plastics, No.

4:04-cv-21823-TLW (D.S.C. Sept. 19, 2006)). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cooper v. Nan Ya Plastics, (4th Cir. 2007).

Cooper v. Nan Ya Plastics (Cooper v. Nan Ya Plastics) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.