Cooper v. Nan Ya Plastics
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-2088
ROY T. COOPER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NAN YA PLASTICS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:04-cv-21823-TLW)
Submitted: February 22, 2007 Decided: February 27, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roy T. Cooper, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Pharr Pearson, Cheryl Lynne Behymer, FISHER & PHILLIPS, LLP, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Roy T. Cooper appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing
the employment discrimination action Cooper brought against his
former employer, Nan Ya Plastics. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. (Cooper v. Nan Ya Plastics, No.
4:04-cv-21823-TLW (D.S.C. Sept. 19, 2006)). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cooper v. Nan Ya Plastics (Cooper v. Nan Ya Plastics) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.