Cooper v. Nan Ya Plastics

Fourth Circuit

Cooper v. Nan Ya Plastics

219 F. App'x 321

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 27, 2007·No. No. 06-2088·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Roy T. Cooper appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing the employment discrimination action Cooper brought against his former employer, Nan Ya Plastics. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. (Cooper v. Nan Ya Plastics, No. 4:04-cv-21823-TLW (D.S.C. Sept. 19, 2006)). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Roy T. Cooper appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing the employment discrimination action Cooper brought against his former employer, Nan Ya Plastics. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. (Cooper v. Nan Ya Plastics, No. 4:04-cv-21823-TLW (D.S.C. Sept. 19, 2006)). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cooper v. Nan Ya Plastics, 219 F. App'x 321 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

219 F. App'x 321 (Cooper v. Nan Ya Plastics) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.