Coonrad v. Marriott
64 N.Y.S. 1133
Opinion
Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed, without costs, on the ground that the contract of sale given by defendant Marriott to the plaintiff, Coonrad, was not of such a fair, just, and equitable character as will be specifically enforced by a court of equity. Seymour v. Delancey, 6 Johns. Ch. 222; Margraf v. Muir, 57 N. Y. 158; Sherman v. Wright, 49 N. Y. 227. Complaint dismissed, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Coonrad v. Marriott, 64 N.Y.S. 1133 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1899).
64 N.Y.S. 1133 (Coonrad v. Marriott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sherman v. . Wright
49 N.Y. 227 (New York Court of Appeals, 1872)
Seymour v. Delancey
6 Johns. Ch. 222 (New York Court of Chancery, 1822)