Coonrad v. Marriott
64 N.Y.S. 1133
This text of 64 N.Y.S. 1133 (Coonrad v. Marriott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Coonrad v. Marriott, 64 N.Y.S. 1133 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1899).
Opinion
Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed, without costs, on the ground that the contract of sale given by defendant Marriott to the plaintiff, Coonrad, was not of such a fair, just, and equitable character as will be specifically enforced by a court of equity. Seymour v. Delancey, 6 Johns. Ch. 222; Margraf v. Muir, 57 N. Y. 158; Sherman v. Wright, 49 N. Y. 227. Complaint dismissed, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sherman v. . Wright
49 N.Y. 227 (New York Court of Appeals, 1872)
Seymour v. Delancey
6 Johns. Ch. 222 (New York Court of Chancery, 1822)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
64 N.Y.S. 1133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coonrad-v-marriott-nysupct-1899.