Coonrad v. Marriott

29 Misc. 739
New York Supreme Court·Decided September 15, 1899·Published

Opinion

Hiscook, J.

Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed without costs on the ground that the contract of sale given by defendant Marriott to the plaintiff Coonrad was not of such a fair, just and equitable character as will be specifically enforced by a court of equity. Seymour v. Delancey, 6 Johns. Ch. 222; Margraf v. Muir, 57 N. Y. 158; Sherman v. Wright, 49 id. 227.

Complaint dismissed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coonrad v. Marriott, 29 Misc. 739 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1899).

29 Misc. 739 (Coonrad v. Marriott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seymour v. Delancey
6 Johns. Ch. 222 (New York Court of Chancery, 1822)