Cook v. State
1919 OK CR 119, 179 P. 624, 15 Okla. Crim. 695, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 89
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cook v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 14 Okla. Crim. 119 →
Opinion
Plaintiffs in error, J. H. Cook and E. J. Brown,, were jointly tried and convicted in the district'court of Garfield county of keeping a place in the city of Enid with the felonious intent and purpose of selling intoxicating liquor. To reverse the judgments rendered on the verdict, they appealed-.
In the case of Proctor v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 338, 176 Pac. 771, the-statute upon which this proescution is based was held unconstitutional and void. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgments are reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cook v. State, 1919 OK CR 119, 179 P. 624, 15 Okla. Crim. 695, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 89 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).
1919 OK CR 119 (Cook v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Proctor v. State
1918 OK CR 190 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1918)