Cook v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Cook v. State

1919 OK CR 18, 177 P. 380, 15 Okla. Crim. 408, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 17

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cook v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 14 Okla. Crim. 119 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided January 15, 1919·No. No. A-2803.·Published

Opinion

GALBRAITH, Special Judge.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of keeping a place with the intention and for the purpose of selling intoxicating liquors, and was sentenced to be confined in the penitentiary for one year and to pay a fine of $50, under section 4, c. 26, Sess. Laws 1918.

This case involves the same issues as the case of Proctor v. State, ante, p. 338, 176 Pac. 771, decided this term, and is controlled thereby. For the reasons set out in that opinion, judgment appealed from is reversed.

BOYLE, P. J., and ARMSTRONG, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GALBRAITH, Special Judge.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of keeping a place with the intention and for the purpose of selling intoxicating liquors, and was sentenced to be confined in the penitentiary for one year and to pay a fine of $50, under section 4, c. 26, Sess. Laws 1918.

This case involves the same issues as the case of Proctor v. State, ante, p. 338, 176 Pac. 771, decided this term, and is controlled thereby. For the reasons set out in that opinion, judgment appealed from is reversed.

BOYLE, P. J., and ARMSTRONG, J., concur.

Cook v. State, 1919 OK CR 18, 177 P. 380, 15 Okla. Crim. 408, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 17 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

1919 OK CR 18 (Cook v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related