Cook v. State
1911 OK CR 529, 120 P. 1040, 6 Okla. Crim. 696, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 543
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cook v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 3 Okla. Crim. 426 →
Opinion
G. W. Cook, plaintiff in error, was convicted of having possession of intoxicating liquors with the intention of violating provisions of the prohibition law. The facts and questions of law are the same as in the case of G. W. Cook v. State, infra, for the reasons given in the opinion in that case the judgment is reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cook v. State, 1911 OK CR 529, 120 P. 1040, 6 Okla. Crim. 696, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 543 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).
1911 OK CR 529 (Cook v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.