Cook v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Cook v. State

1913 OK CR 193, 131 P. 1196, 9 Okla. Crim. 721, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 140

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 9, 1913

DocketNo. A-1568.

StatusPublished

This text of 1913 OK CR 193 (Cook v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cook v. State, 1913 OK CR 193, 131 P. 1196, 9 Okla. Crim. 721, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 140 (Okla. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Garfield county, of the offense 'of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquors. September 30th, 1911, he was sentenced to serve a term of one hundred fifty days in the county jail and to pay a fine of two hundred dollars. To reverse this judgment there was filed in this court! January 5th, 1912, a petition in error with case-made. From a careful examination of the record it is apparent that the several assignments of error are without merit. The information was sufficient.

Two witnesses, George Hennington and Tom 'Seaton, testified for the state that they bought bottled beer in the defendant’s place of business during the month of June, 1911, and there is evidence of the payment by the defendant of the special tax required of liquor dealers by the United States on December 10th, 1910, which did not expire until the end of the following June. There was no evidence offered on behalf of the defendant. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Garfield county, of the offense 'of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquors. September 30th, 1911, he was sentenced to serve a term of one hundred fifty days in the county jail and to pay a fine of two hundred dollars. To reverse this judgment there was filed in this court! January 5th, 1912, a petition in error with case-made. From a careful examination of the record it is apparent that the several assignments of error are without merit. The information was sufficient.

Two witnesses, George Hennington and Tom 'Seaton, testified for the state that they bought bottled beer in the defendant’s place of business during the month of June, 1911, and there is evidence of the payment by the defendant of the special tax required of liquor dealers by the United States on December 10th, 1910, which did not expire until the end of the following June. There was no evidence offered on behalf of the defendant. The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1913 OK CR 193, 131 P. 1196, 9 Okla. Crim. 721, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cook-v-state-oklacrimapp-1913.