Cook v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Cook v. State

277 S.W.3d 303, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 73, 2009 WL 241920

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 3, 2009·No. ED 90947·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Steven Cook, appeals the motion court’s order denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order and judgment denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Steven Cook, appeals the motion court’s order denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order and judgment denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Cook v. State, 277 S.W.3d 303, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 73, 2009 WL 241920 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

277 S.W.3d 303 (Cook v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related