Cook v. State

219 S.W.3d 280, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 576, 2007 WL 1052662
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 10, 2007
DocketED 88505
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 219 S.W.3d 280 (Cook v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cook v. State, 219 S.W.3d 280, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 576, 2007 WL 1052662 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Jimmie Cook, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits without an evidentiary hearing his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s judgment is based on findings of facts and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bryant v. COLOR ART PRINTING
219 S.W.3d 280 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
219 S.W.3d 280, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 576, 2007 WL 1052662, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cook-v-state-moctapp-2007.