Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Cook v. State

Cook v. State

61 So. 3d 1279, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 7750, 2011 WL 2097697
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cook v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 993 So. 2d 1186 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 27, 2011·No. No. 5D11-957·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary denial of Michael Lamar Cook’s rule 3.850 Motion for Post Conviction Relief, but remand for correction of a scrivener’s error in the circuit court’s order, which, at one point, mistakenly refers to the defendant by another name.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED for Correction of Scrivener’s Error.

ORFINGER, TORPY, and JACOBUS JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cook v. State, 61 So. 3d 1279, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 7750, 2011 WL 2097697 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

61 So. 3d 1279 (Cook v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.