Cook v. State

2 So. 3d 1116, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3223, 2009 WL 413497
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cook v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 947 So. 2d 1207
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 20, 2009·No. 5D08-2386·Published

Opinion

SAWAYA, J.

Chrissandra Cook appeals the order revoking her probation. She readily admits the trial court correctly found that she violated the conditions of her probation by failing to report to her probation officer, failing to complete an anti-theft/impulse control class, and failing to perform required community service hours. However, the trial court also found that she willfully and substantially violated her probation by failing to pay the previously determined amount of restitution. The problem with that finding is that there was no evidence presented at the revocation hearing that she had the ability to pay the restitution. Therefore, we reverse as to that finding and remand to the trial court to enter a corrected revocation order that does not reference the failure to pay restitution. The remainder of the revocation order is affirmed, including the court’s conclusion that Cook violated her probation by failing to comply with the reporting, class, and community service requirements. See Rogan v. State, 934 So.2d 593 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.

ORFINGER and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cook v. State, 2 So. 3d 1116, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3223, 2009 WL 413497 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

2 So. 3d 1116 (Cook v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rogan v. State
934 So. 2d 593 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)