Cook v. State

548 So. 2d 257, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1722, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4091, 1989 WL 78867
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 20, 1989·No. No. 88-999·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

GOSHORN, Judge.

The appellant, Jerry Joe Cook, was charged with four counts of lewd and lascivious assault in the presence of a child under the age of sixteen. Section 800.-04(3), Fla.Stat. (1987). The jury convicted him on two counts as charged and two counts of the lesser included offense of attempt. We affirm.

At the trial, as each child victim testified, a screen was placed between the witness and the defendant. On appeal Cook argues [258]*258that this violated his confrontation rights under the Sixth Amendment, citing Coy v. Iowa, — U.S. —, 108 S.Ct. 2798, 101 L.Ed.2d 857 (1988).

This issue has not been preserved. At trial Cook merely made a general objection to the use of the screen, without giving any basis for his objection. In order to preserve this type of challange a specific objection at trial is required. Gibson v. State, 533 So.2d 338 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).

The appellant’s other points on appeal are without merit.

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH, J., concurs. COWART, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cook v. State, 548 So. 2d 257, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1722, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4091, 1989 WL 78867 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

548 So. 2d 257 (Cook v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

O'Brien v. State
549 So. 2d 1048 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)