Cook v. State
Opinions
The appellant, Jerry Joe Cook, was charged with four counts of lewd and lascivious assault in the presence of a child under the age of sixteen. Section 800.-04(3), Fla.Stat. (1987). The jury convicted him on two counts as charged and two counts of the lesser included offense of attempt. We affirm.
At the trial, as each child victim testified, a screen was placed between the witness and the defendant. On appeal Cook argues [258]*258that this violated his confrontation rights under the Sixth Amendment, citing Coy v. Iowa, — U.S. —, 108 S.Ct. 2798, 101 L.Ed.2d 857 (1988).
This issue has not been preserved. At trial Cook merely made a general objection to the use of the screen, without giving any basis for his objection. In order to preserve this type of challange a specific objection at trial is required. Gibson v. State, 533 So.2d 338 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).
The appellant’s other points on appeal are without merit.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
548 So. 2d 257 (Cook v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.