Cook v. State

533 So. 2d 1180, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2150, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4055, 1988 WL 121469
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cook v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 571 So. 2d 530
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 13, 1988·No. No. 86-30·Published

Opinion

CORRECTED OPINION

PER CURIAM.

After a full and fair evidentiary hearing at which the defendant testified, as agreed, by affidavit, see Cook v. Florida Parole and Probation Comm’n, 749 F.2d 678 (11th Cir.1985), the trial court denied Cook’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief from a 1972 rape conviction upon the findings that his plea of guilty was freely and voluntarily made and that it was taken in full compliance with the requirements of law. See Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.172. Since the testimony at the hearing fully supports these determinations, the order below is

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cook v. State, 533 So. 2d 1180, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2150, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4055, 1988 WL 121469 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

533 So. 2d 1180 (Cook v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related