Cook v. McMurria

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Cook v. McMurria

19 Ga. App. 491

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 1, 1917

Docket7718

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 19 Ga. App. 491 (Cook v. McMurria) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cook v. McMurria, 19 Ga. App. 491 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. “This court, by the constitutional amendment creating it, is limited in jurisdiction to the correction of errors of law alone, and therefore has no power to grant a new trial on the ground that [492]*492the verdict is strongly contrary to the weight of the evidence, if there is any evidence at all to support it.” Edge v. Thomas, 9 Ga. App. 559 (71 S. E. 875).

Certiorari; from Miller superior court—Judge Worrill. June 17, 1916.

Billie B. Bush, for plaintiff in error. P. D. Rich, contra.

2. No other error being complained of in the instant case, and there being some evidence to support the verdict, the trial judge did not err in refusing to sanction the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and J enjoins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworth, J.

1. “This court, by the constitutional amendment creating it, is limited in jurisdiction to the correction of errors of law alone, and therefore has no power to grant a new trial on the ground that [492]*492the verdict is strongly contrary to the weight of the evidence, if there is any evidence at all to support it.” Edge v. Thomas, 9 Ga. App. 559 (71 S. E. 875).

Certiorari; from Miller superior court—Judge Worrill. June 17, 1916.

Billie B. Bush, for plaintiff in error. P. D. Rich, contra.

2. No other error being complained of in the instant case, and there being some evidence to support the verdict, the trial judge did not err in refusing to sanction the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and J enjoins, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 Ga. App. 491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cook-v-mcmurria-gactapp-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack