Adams v. Elbert County

100 S.E. 232, 24 Ga. App. 176, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 480
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 18, 1919
Docket10187
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 100 S.E. 232 (Adams v. Elbert County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adams v. Elbert County, 100 S.E. 232, 24 Ga. App. 176, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 480 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. When considered in connection with the entire charge of the court and in the light of the evidence, there is no error harmful to the plaintiff in the excerpt from the charge of which complaint is made in the motion for a new trial.

2. “This court, by the constitutional amendment creating it, is limited in jurisdiction to the correction of errors of law alone, and therefore has no power to grant a new trial on the ground that the verdict is strongly contrary to the weight of evidence, if there is any evidence at all to support it.” Edge v. Thomas, 9 Ga. App. 559 (71 S. E. 875); Cook v. McMurria, 19 Ga. App. 491 (91 S. E. 785); Toole v. Jones, 19 Ga. App. 24 (90 S. E. 732); McCarty v. Keys, 19 Ga. App. 494 (91 S. E. 875).

3. There is some evidence to support the .verdict, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur. J. T. Sisk, for plaintiff. Z. B. Rogers, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lane Drug Stores Inc. v. Brooks
29 S.E.2d 716 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 S.E. 232, 24 Ga. App. 176, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-elbert-county-gactapp-1919.