Adams v. Elbert County

100 S.E. 232, 24 Ga. App. 176, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 480
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 18, 1919·No. 10187·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. When considered in connection with the entire charge of the court and in the light of the evidence, there is no error harmful to the plaintiff in the excerpt from the charge of which complaint is made in the motion for a new trial.

2. “This court, by the constitutional amendment creating it, is limited in jurisdiction to the correction of errors of law alone, and therefore has no power to grant a new trial on the ground that the verdict is strongly contrary to the weight of evidence, if there is any evidence at all to support it.” Edge v. Thomas, 9 Ga. App. 559 (71 S. E. 875); Cook v. McMurria, 19 Ga. App. 491 (91 S. E. 785); Toole v. Jones, 19 Ga. App. 24 (90 S. E. 732); McCarty v. Keys, 19 Ga. App. 494 (91 S. E. 875).

3. There is some evidence to support the .verdict, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur. J. T. Sisk, for plaintiff. Z. B. Rogers, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams v. Elbert County, 100 S.E. 232, 24 Ga. App. 176, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 480 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

100 S.E. 232 (Adams v. Elbert County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lane Drug Stores Inc. v. Brooks
29 S.E.2d 716 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1944)