Cook v. Johnson
This text of 121 Mass. 326 (Cook v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Although the first entry of the mortgagee was ineffectual for the purpose of foreclosure, because the certificate thereof was not recorded within thirty days, as required by the [328]*328Gen. Sts. c. 140, § 2, yet that entry, with the notice to the tenant, was sufficient to entitle the mortgagee to the rents under the lease made since the mortgage. Stone v. Patterson, 19 Pick. 476. Welch v. Adams, 1 Met. 494. Shepard v. Richards, 2 Gray, 424. The subsequent entry for the purpose of foreclosure may have been a waiver of any right to foreclose under a previous entry, but did not impair the mortgagee’s right to the rents, or waive the effect of his previous entry and notice, so far as that right was concerned. Fay v. Valentine, 5 Pick. 418. Page v. Robinson, 10 Cush. 99. Fletcher v. Cary, 103 Mass. 475. Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
121 Mass. 326, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cook-v-johnson-mass-1876.